LateralsEvolutionary relationship of axes and laterals; evolution of megaphylls; Arber on leaf as partial-shoot; buds and plant architecture As discussed in relation to shoots and roots, the distinction between axes and laterals is, in evolutionary terms, rather arbitrary. Beerling (2005) has reviewed the evidence that the morphogenetic capacity for leaf production (and, one may suppose, foliar senescence) was present in the earliest vascular land plants but megaphylls did not appear for 40 to 50 million years. It is suggested that the decisive factor in relieving this constraint was the fall in the concentration of atmospheric CO2 during the late Palaeozoic. In the tradition of Goethe and Troll (Kaplan 2001), Agnes Arber (1950) wrote “the leaf is a partial-shoot, revealing an inherent urge towards becoming a whole shoot, but never actually attaining this goal, since radial symmetry and the capacity for apical growth suffer inhibition”. Although Arber’s later writings on plant morphogenesis were philosophical and even mystical in origin, her insights are in tune with modern ideas of developmental genetics (Kirchoff 2001). Plant architecture is dependent to a large extent on the pattern of growth, rest and death of lateral and apical buds. For example differential growth and abortion of buds accounts for sympodial and monopodial modes of branching. The genes determining plant architecture are highly conserved across the range of angiosperms (Wang and Li 2006) and are likely to be ancient, contributing to the evolution of three-dimensional branched forms from the thalloid construction of the earliest land plants (Hagemann 1999). References
Links and further reading
Created by: system last modification: Friday 04 of April, 2008 [09:50:17 UTC] by Sid |
Login |